Globalization of supercuspidal representations over function fields and applications
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Construction of Tame Supercuspidal Representations
The notion of depth is defined by Moy-Prasad [MP2]. The notion of a generic character will be defined in §9. When G = GLn or G is the multiplicative group of a central division algebra of dimension n with (n, p) = 1, our generic characters are just the generic characters in [My] (where the definition is due to Kutzko). Moreover, in these cases, our construction literally specializes to Howe’s c...
متن کاملSupercuspidal Representations: an Exhaustion Theorem
Let k be a p-adic field of characteristic zero and residue characteristic p. Let G be the group of k-points of a connected reductive group G defined over k. In [38], Yu gives a fairly general construction of supercuspidal representations of G in a certain tame situation. In this paper, subject to some hypotheses on G and k, we prove that all supercuspidal representations arise through his const...
متن کاملcompactifications and representations of transformation semigroups
this thesis deals essentially (but not from all aspects) with the extension of the notion of semigroup compactification and the construction of a general theory of semitopological nonaffine (affine) transformation semigroup compactifications. it determines those compactification which are universal with respect to some algebric or topological properties. as an application of the theory, it is i...
15 صفحه اولRefined Anisotropic K-types and Supercuspidal Representations
Let G be any connected reductive group defined over a nonarchimedean local field F of residual characteristic p. Under some tameness assumptions on G, we construct families of positive-depth supercuspidal representations of G = G(F ). In particular, we classify (§2.7) the representations of G that contain any anisotropic unrefined minimal K-type (in the sense of MoyPrasad [28]) that satisfies a...
متن کاملTypes for supercuspidal representations of GL(N)
We recall here the basic definitions needed to construct simple types, with no proofs given of the many claims that we make. For a much more detailed account, see [1] and the many other sources cited therein. Note that most of the statements made here could be proven without much difficulty for the reader who has the time and inclination. Any statements requiring a much more elaborate proof are...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the European Mathematical Society
سال: 2018
ISSN: 1435-9855
DOI: 10.4171/jems/825